5
Fri, 23rd Oct 2009 | Hi_ImJenny | 347 Views, 1 Nod.

Gothic literature? It'll remain the same... (2021)

For A2 Literature, I'm studying Gothic Literature and the conventions that authors encompass to build tension and suspense amongst their readers. Writers such as Emily Bronte use the 'sublime' in Wuthering Heights; her description of the Yorkshire moors and the weather do go on for paragraphs and paragraphs but it's the clever way in which she writes that can build the much desired suspense. That's something Gothic literature is all about; picking up on the little details, the finer details can have a much bigger effect than sub-human characters such as vampires and ghosts.

A fan of Wuthering Heights; Dracula, Frankenstein and Angela Carter's The Bloody Chamber, I feel that whatever happens in the world of literature, if and when the Gothic has a revival - such concepts and conventions will remain.

'Action' and 'Adventure' books have changed but that's a sign of the times. Going from the 'Famous Five' to the 'Alex Rider' series does reflect how society has changed and highlight the stark difference in which children 'play' and socialise. Yet, since starting the A2 course I've realised that plots needn't be so far fetched and out of this world so to speak, all you need is a simple setting and characters that are true to life with flaws yet qualities that make them redeemable and likeable.

I'm not for a moment saying I could be the next Bronte far from it, but if an author was to sit down in front of their laptop like I am now (without Lemsip of course) and thought 'I'm going to revolutionise literature' they needn't to be honest. Looking back at the classics would be the best place to start and then taking those elements that really stand out and putting their own identity to it.

Gothic literature can be incorporated into a book and the readers not really know about it, but that's the 'beauty' of it. But I believe that as romance novels change to suit the times alongside adventure books, and even children's books, the gothic will stay firmly rooted in the nineteenth century where it belongs. Only then, in my mind, was it at its best.

                


 | Printable Version | 
Loading...
Noddleit users login to comment or Signup
Username or Email
Password
Lost password?

Fri, 23rd Oct 2009
Exactly!! If only I could give a point for a comment. Y'see you've learnt something new :) xx
Nod+ (0)
 | 
Fri, 23rd Oct 2009
Isn't it true to say then Jenny that, unlike say romance novels which will move with the times as moving times become more open and graphic about factual romantic relationships, modern day gothic novels can't move with the times because we know no more about non-factual devils, vampires and demons than they did in the nineteenth century. Or don't I get a credit mark for that one?
Nod+ (1)
 | 
Fri, 23rd Oct 2009
@BC: You've got it :) That's what I'm getting at, those three modern examples got their influence and standing from what came before - the works of Shelley, Stoker and Bronte. It's the foundations of it.
Nod+ (0)
 | 
Fri, 23rd Oct 2009
I don't at all claim to know what I'm talking about here Jenny so I'm just dipping my toe to see if I've got your meaning on Gothic literature. As I understand it, as a layman, the obvious examples would be Frankenstein or Dracula, both of which are set in the period, or thereabouts, you describe. Would Rosemary's Baby, The Shining or Don't Look Now, all three of which I know better as films than books, be three examples of Gothic tales successfully set in more modern times? I like the way you've got me thinking about something I know bugger-all about. Blimey! I might even learn something.
Nod+ (0)
 | 

 

Login or signup
UserID
Pword
Keep me logged in on this computer
  Help.


Login with Facebook

Search
This Site,  the Web

Intelligent Exposure.
Loading...

0.147877